LESBIANISM FILM NAMED "FIRE"
By S.P. Attri (USA)

1. Lesbianism has its origin and source in Islam. Though lesbianism occurs outside of Islam also, the major practitioners of this art reside only inside the bandwidth of Islam. Of course, most Hindus have slipped up on that and do not have a clue about this Islamic connection because the truth about it is being drowned out by the redwood horns of the false-hood manufacturers of the 3-M company (Moslems, Missionaries, and Marxists). The 3-M company is assisted in this nefarious effort by their Phony-Liberal Hindu cronies who have targetted BJP and the Hindus, whom they categorize, with gusto and gaiety, as the loathsome Hindu Communalists. The recent election setback of the BJP in three states has also augmented the appetite of these home-grown traitors to launch their furious anti-Hindu barrages. One might reasonably ask what is the rationale behind the pyrotechnics of these sworn traitors, especially their fury and froth on a movie that goes by the name of "FIRE."

2. The creator and Producer-Director of this controversial movie is an Indian Hippie named Deepa Mehta, who is presently living in Canada, a place where homo-sexuality and lesbianism are frequently-discussed subjects. Deepa has been absent from India for quite a while now and her knowledge of the current social customs of India is at best questionable. True to her Hippie Credentials, however, she is out to expose and destroy the male-dominated patriarchal system of India, wherein the woman is oppressed and her sexual urges are suppressed. To challenge this oppressive patriarchal order, Deepa has chosen a lesbian theme, suitably mixed with profanity, to take on the existing social customs order of India. What she is actually accomplishing by doing that, however, is the disintegration of the traditional family system and her usage of the extreme measures is offending the sensibilities of the Hindu. She figures she has to do it to increase the controversy of the film to attract attention and to achieve the widest possibility publicity.

3. Through her directorial tricks, Deepa Mehta has amalgmated the lonliness of Indian (Hindu) women with lesbianism. But where did Deepa get the idea that women in India turn to lesbianism because of circumstances of lonliness?

It is true, of course, that women sometimes are lonely in India and at other places too. But after marriage, Indian women often stay in the house of their in-laws while their husbands are out on a job in a differrent city or even in a different country for long periods of time. This is a well-established custom, fully accepted, and widely practised in Indian society. There is never a case of lesbianism arising out of these domestic situations. Therefore, Deepa Mehta's deductions are flawed for Indian customs and situations.

4. Then what could be Deepa's motivations? The real motive of Deepa Mehta is hunger for publicity, publicity at any cost, and her pretense as a champion of oppressed women is a phony facade. Most women in India don't even know what lesbianism is. However, this kind of sheen and stuff of lesbianism does appeal to the Phony-Liberal Hindus who are tie-ing together with the 3-M company to desecrate and destroy Hinduism with names of Hindu goddesses Sita and Radha, as the names of two characters in the movie "FIRE," in a lesbian relationship.

A question may be asked why were Moslem women names like Khadija (Prophet Mohammad's wife) and Fatima (Prophet's daughter) not used in this movie. Moslem women are much more oppressed in India than the Hindu women are and have much greater need of liberation. Why were the Moslem women ignored and left out? The answer is simply a matter of practical reality. If Deepa had used any Moslem names, the Moslems would assassinate Deepa and burn down the cinema halls where this devilish movie is shown. Deepa knows this unconditional outcome very very well. Moslems have demonstrated this kind of capability and outburst reaction in the past and the lessons have not been lost on Deepa. Deepa also knows that Hindus would not assassinate her nor do the other kinds of nasty things to her that the Moslems would surely do to her. It is simply a matter of ground reality. This mixed up broad is not dumb, she is collecting food in her net and she certainly knows where her meal- ticket is. Anti-Hindu "character names" are a much safer bet for this kind of questionable and controversial film than are the anti-Islamic names. She has, therefore, cast her lot with the anti-Hindu crowd, hungry as she is for publicity and notoriety, and is putting up a stunt to get some free publicity through a pyrotechnic baptism of the film.

5. Deepa's knowledge of current Indian social customs may be marginal but her ring of powerful friends is anything but marginal, and with band-wagoners like Dilip Kumar (real name : Mohammad Sarwar Yusuf Khan), Shabana Azmi and her husband Javed Akhtar backing her up, she has ample support. It is very likely the help of such powerful friends and connections, that got the film through the Censor Board, even though the film has explicit lesbianism theme and has pornographic scenes too. Influence-peddaling and conspiracy, has to be suspected, therefore.

6. The primary band-wagoner and supporter of this damnable movie is Signor Dilip Kumar (real name: Mohammad Sarwar Yusuf Khan), a Moslem of Jehadi status and character, who has hoodwinked the imprudent Hindu Sucker into unsuspiciously trusting his phony dare-devil claim that he is 100% secular. This dude (Yusuf Khan) is a lie-ing scoundrel and his portended secularism is a fraudulent sham. The motivations that spur this Phony Punk are Pan-Islamism and Islamic Jehad. It is no secret that Dilip Kumar proceeds on lecture tours to bring in money for the far-off Bosnian Moslems who are fighting the Kafir Yugoslav Serfs. Dilip Kumar has not raised even one cent for the tens of thousands of Hindus who have been murdered and viciously brutalized by his fellow Moslems in Kashmir and when questioned about this divergent difference, Signor Dilip Kumar takes up a safe posture of silence and he stays "Mum." Raising money aside, Dilip Kumar has not even questioned or censured the the ruthless savagery of his fellow Moslems against the Kafir Hindus of Kashmir. Why?

Because Jehad goes right to his heart and he thorougly approves the bloody slaughter of the Kafir Hindus in Kashmir, who according to his Koran, are sub- human, and he wants the Moslem Jehadi parties to take over Kashmir and kick the Indian Army out of there. To Dilip Kumar, the Moslem terrorists of Kashmir, are servants of Allah, who are only doing their Jehad thing, and are following a policy of "general toleration" as defined by Islam and, therefore, by staying "wordless" he is being "tolerant" and "100% secular" himself.

7. After all, what the Moslems of Kashmir are doing, is eliminating the accursed Kafirs (Infidels) which is perfectly worthy and acceptable by the laws of Koran, the cuddle-fish of Islam. The Kashmiri Moslems are only ending the wicked ways of the Hindu Kafirs, the ways that have been thoroughly condemned in Koran, Hadis, and the Shariat of Islam. It is because of such supreme and subtle services to Islam, that Pakistan awarded the medal of Nishan-E-Pakistan to Signor Dilip Kumar and Dilip Kumar travelled to Pakistan to pick up his prestigious award, given to him by Pakistan, to keep up his elusive hate-Hindu hobby-horse trotting at full speed. Inspite of these Islamic transactions and stitches, Dilip Kumar continues to insist hypocritically that he is Hindustani and 100% Secular. What a mealy-mouthed Machiavelian lie?

The wicked antics of Dilip Kumar and of other Moslems like Shabana Azmi and others who claim to be 100% secular, should not stupefy any Hindu because Moslems can talk from both sides of the mouth especially with a Kafir and Koran gives them specific unlimited permission to do so, while dealing with a Kafir. Therefore, Moslems like Dilip Kumar and Shabana Azmi, covertly and closed-mouthedly hunger to insult, desecrate, and degrade the Hindu and his Hinduism and they raise their cudgels for this purpose by using the phony guise of artistic freedom, individual rights, individual freedom and crap like that, while intrinsically intending fully well to blast Hinduism right out of existence.

8. It is no secret that Signor Dilip Kumar has not been doing much of anything for quite some time. Therefore, when the story of the film "FIRE" was brought to his attention, he leaped at the chance, it brought out the Moslem inside of him. This is because the film has juicy names of Hindu goddesses for the names of characters, in a lesbian relationship, in the film. What better place could there be for Dilip Kumar to try out his Islamic deception to shove the Kafir Hindu and his Hinduism into the ground, while at the same time becoming a grand patriarch of Islam himself in the process and earning a ticket to the Moslem's Bihisht?

Besides, in the present time, abusing and exploiting the Hindu gods and goddesses is fashionable, wide spread and approved by the Phony-Liberal Hindu crowd, casting his lot with this crowd, therefore, is a safe bet for Dilip Kumar. He knows very well that it is the same Phony-Liberal crowd that was pitching for M.F. Hussein, when he was drawing the nude pictures of our Hindu goddesses. The Phony-Liberals did not even notice the obvious double-standard that Hussein was employing; Hussein did not dare draw the nude picture (or any picture) of Khadija, Fatima, Ayesha, Mohammad or any other Moslem person and Phonies did not even notice that the pretended secularism of Hussein is a malicious misrepresentation.

9. The straight-forward truth is that the 3-M company and their Phony-Liberal Hindu cronies do not give a damn about Hindu culture, they want to exterminate it and they do it in the guise and guile of individual freedom, artistic freedom, and other riff-raff. It is true, of course, that if Dilip Kumar & Co want to produce a film, they can certainly do it but if they depict lesbian relationship between our goddesses, such as Sita and Radha, as has been done in the film "FIRE," we Hindus cannot tolerate it. This kind of exhibition of Hinduism desecration and profanity is not art, but a clear attempt to demote and degrade Hinduism and Hindus of today are not going to take it lying down, they will be counter- punching.

Shri Bal Thackeray of Shiv Sena has made an exceptionally excellent proposal to Dilip Kumar. Thackeray says that he will not oppose this film if names like Shabana and Saira (name of Dilip Kumar's wife) are used in place of Sita and Radha, for the names of the characters in the film. This is a tremendous proposal and a chance for Dilip Kumar to demonstrate the sincerity of his secularism that he has been touting all this time. We are interested in finding out how Dilip and Shabana would react to names of Shabana and Saira as the names of lesbian partners in the film "FIRE."

10. This is a litmus test for Dilip's secularism. But Dilip and Shabana are not taking up Thackeray's proposal. Instead, they are busy bristling with indignation and are crying about individual rights, artistic freedom etc etc.

But what about the individual rights of Salman Rushdie and Shah Bano? What about the individual rights of Triple-Talaqued women with children, who have been reduced to poverty, to die on the foot-paths? What about the thousands and thousands of Moslem women who are victims of barbaric laws of Islam?

Both Dilip Kumar and Shabana Azmi cry themselves hoarse talking about artistic freedom and individual rights, but they both stay "Mute And Mum" when the violators are Moslems and their Islam; they display their Standard Islamic Double-Standard.

11. In the meantime, watching the outrageous actions of the producers of this film, the Shiv Sainiks, clad only in undergarments, are now presenting themselves at every place where Nangon-Ka-Neta (name given to Dilip Kumar by Shiv Sainiks) goes. They will do the same thing at every place where Shabana Azmi and her husband Javed Akhtar go for their social functions. Let us see how Dilip Kumar and Shabana Azmi react to these demonstrations. All these demonstrations are peaceful, there is no violence whatsoever and, therefore, no body can object.

Asks Shri Bal Thackeray: If Dilip Kumar and Shabana cannot tolerate Shiv Sainiks stripped down to their underwears, how can they put up with the scenes of nudity in the film? A logical question, indeed!

Dilip Kumar and Shabana have requested police protection. What for ?Who are they kidding? Shiv Sainiks are not trying to hurt either Dilip Kumar or Shabana Azmi. They are only trying to humor them and they have thrown a splendid challenge to both Dilip and Shabana regarding the change of names of characters in the film.

But it seems that these two Pakis, Dilip and Shabana, have no intention of taking up the superb proposal of the Shiv Sainks. Instead they will do what they really like to do i.e. Bad-Mouth Hinduism plenteously , insult and degrade it as much as they can, and hoist and heave the slogans of artistic freedom etc in the guise of free-thinking 100% secular Indians. We Hindus need to give some befitting humor to these Dumb Pakis. Will they come out clean before the Shiv Sainiks and take the humor or go back and wear the BURQUA?

For more articles check out:

http://www.hinduunity.org/attri.html